Reading the gameweek calendar, the player list and the fixture schedule from the FPL API.
Reading the gameweek calendar, the player list and the fixture schedule from the FPL API.
Explore
Rise and fall pressure — and when it should be ignored.
181 players have moved price since the season opened. FPL publishes the pressure behind every price, and it is read here: 147 under pressure to rise, 352 under pressure to fall, and 49 prices are locked by FPL for now.
The market
FPL publishes the pressure for 654 of 654 players. Here, furthest along first: 20 of the 147 under pressure to rise, and 20 of the 352 under pressure to fall; a locked price is left out until FPL frees it.
Official · basis: bootstrap-static/ elements[] — each player’s listed price, ownership and transfers this gameweek; the progress toward a change, its hourly rate and FPL’s own projection for the next three changes · updated 6 min ago · confidence: high
Projection · basis: xPts for GW4 and the GW4-GW8 window. Built from FPL’s own published season data — the player list, the fixture list and the points table — read together as one snapshot of the 2026/27 season and its 38 gameweeks. Points are counted with FPL’s published values rather than with a copy of them. A player's rate of scoring, assisting and keeping clean sheets is pulled toward a fixed population of 387 players with a completed season, independent of which individual records this screen fetched, so a short record is not read as confidently as a long one. Everything FPL does not publish is at this product’s own stated default. Player rates come from the season totals FPL publishes on each player, which for 2026/27 are this season's and still in progress. Every player is projected from his full record of completed seasons, read for all 654 of them at once and shared by every screen. Those cohorts are the same for everybody, so what one player carries cannot move another player's figure. 387 of 654 players have appeared so far in 2026/27; the rest have no minutes yet and are projected from a price-and-position cohort prior instead. · updated 6 min ago · confidence: medium
A projection, not a result. It states the most likely outcome, and football regularly disagrees.
MIDBHA£5.5m16.1% owned
95.5% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 314.
FPL’s projection: 97% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 4 of 5), then 102% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5), then 106% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5).
96,195 in, 60,033 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 12.3 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
DEFBHA£4.7m18.9% owned
90.5% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 1,816.
FPL’s projection: 102% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 5 of 5), then 126% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5), then 150% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5).
196,069 in, 38,062 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 9.2 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
FWDLIV£9.0m19.2% owned
88.9% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 2,693.
FPL’s projection: 106% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 5 of 5), then 141% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5), then 177% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5).
273,032 in, 28,796 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 12.2 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
MIDNEW£6.1m10.9% owned
88.3% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 547.
FPL’s projection: 92% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 99% of the way (FPL’s band 4 of 5), then 106% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5).
141,738 in, 70,756 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 10.7 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
FWDFUL£6.0m4.4% owned
81.0% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 351.
FPL’s projection: 79% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 74% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 70% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5).
16,964 in, 37,979 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 0.7 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
DEFHUL£4.0m6.5% owned
78.7% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 1,025.
FPL’s projection: 85% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 99% of the way (FPL’s band 4 of 5), then 112% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5).
111,446 in, 17,942 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 0.6 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
FWDMCI£15.5m71.2% owned
76.0% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 59.
FPL’s projection: 76% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 77% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 78% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5).
63,126 in, 47,744 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 26.7 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
DEFARS£5.5m7.7% owned
72.0% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 138.
FPL’s projection: 73% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 75% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 77% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5).
51,137 in, 41,056 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 7.4 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
MIDBOU£6.0m3.7% owned
68.3% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 1,784.
FPL’s projection: 79% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 103% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5), then 126% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5).
144,655 in, 13,198 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 12.4 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
FWDARS£7.5m7.2% owned
68.1% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 1,121.
FPL’s projection: 75% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 90% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 105% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5).
64,200 in, 28,758 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 8.7 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
DEFEVE£6.0m11.1% owned
67.5% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 407.
FPL’s projection: 70% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 75% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 81% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5).
61,116 in, 31,003 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 18.2 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
DEFHUL£4.1m10.6% owned
65.9% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 1,199.
FPL’s projection: 73% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 89% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 105% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5).
131,140 in, 23,409 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 8.7 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
DEFNEW£5.1m11.2% owned
65.4% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 1,379.
FPL’s projection: 74% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 92% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 110% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5).
182,044 in, 29,118 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 11.2 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
MIDHUL£4.5m5.0% owned
65.4% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 204.
FPL’s projection: 67% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 69% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 72% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5).
50,195 in, 25,608 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 0.5 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
DEFNEW£4.5m3.6% owned
64.7% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 170.
FPL’s projection: 66% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 68% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 70% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5).
67,150 in, 25,189 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 0.7 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
DEFARS£5.7m47.0% owned
63.8% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 1,945.
FPL’s projection: 76% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 102% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5), then 127% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5).
183,670 in, 29,725 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 12.0 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
DEFMCI£5.6m19.6% owned
61.3% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 921.
FPL’s projection: 67% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 79% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 91% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5).
143,921 in, 43,550 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 13.5 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
MIDCHE£9.6m21.1% owned
59.7% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 1,862.
FPL’s projection: 71% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 96% of the way (FPL’s band 4 of 5), then 120% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5).
238,081 in, 43,571 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 20.9 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
DEFBRE£4.5m5.0% owned
57.6% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 114.
FPL’s projection: 57% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 55% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 54% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5).
19,975 in, 31,979 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 8.6 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
MIDBHA£5.0m4.9% owned
53.4% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 58.
FPL’s projection: 54% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 55% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 55% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5).
33,717 in, 30,688 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 10.3 xPts over GW4–GW8. Decide that first.
Your squad
No FPL team is connected, so there is no squad to read. A team id is public information — nothing here ever asks for your password.
Connect a team, or draft a squad, and each player in it appears here with what he cost, what he sells for, what he is listed at now and FPL’s pressure on his price. Connect a team
FPL’s rules on prices, as the rulebook reads them
Player purchase prices
You buy a player at his listed price, and that purchase price is remembered for as long as you own him.
The whole squad must fit inside 100.0m at the moment each transfer is made.
Player selling prices
If a player's price has fallen you take the fall in full. If it has risen, FPL keeps 50% of the profit.
The half you keep is rounded down to the nearest 0.1m, so a rise of 0.1m is worth nothing to you and a rise of 0.3m is worth the same as a rise of 0.2m.
Price changes
Player prices move during the season in steps of 0.1m as managers buy and sell them.
FPL publishes prices as whole numbers 10 times the value in millions, and does not publish the algorithm that decides when a price moves — this product therefore reports observed prices and never predicts a change as fact.
Why no row says a move matters
“This move matters to the decision” is raised for a player named in one of your open decision rooms — the transfers you are already weighing. The transfers screen weighs a swap by searching, and nothing here runs that search, so a move that screen would weigh but no room names reads as one to ignore for the decision: the football question first.
This product never recommends a transfer to catch or dodge a price change. A tenth of a million is what a move is worth; the football question is worth points, and it is decided first. What has already changed